CMG AdvisorCentral

Tactical investing news, views and resources for financial advisors

TwitterGoogle+Linkedin
  • Blog
    • Contributors
  • Advisor Resources
  • About CMG
    • Sitemap
  • Events

Bob Rubin Interviews David Swensen

Posted on 11.20.17 |

In Friday’s On My Radar, Steve links to a great interview of David Swensen, Yale’s CIO, by former Goldman co-chairman and former Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin.

Take a few minutes and watch the interview.  It’s worth it.  Add Swensen to the list of famed investors predicting low single-digit forward returns.  He shares some sage advice on portfolio management and diversification.

Click the photo for the full interview.

Categories: Portfolio Construction Tags: Diversification, Practice Management, Risk, Risk management, Tactical Investing

Recessions by Decades – Will This be the First Without One?

Posted on 09.11.17 |

Take a look at the recession data in the next chart.  Since 1930, there have been at least one or two recessions every decade.  Three of the post-1930 decades had just one recession and five of the decades had two recessions.  There have been zero recessions so far this current decade.

Will this be the first without recession?  I doubt it very much.  Often I share with you my favorite recession indicator signal charts.  There is no current sign of recession within the next six months.  I’ll keep you posted.  Here are the recessions by decade chart:

Source: Crestmont Research

Let’s continue to keep our eye on leading recession indicators.  The best is an inverted yield curve.  The equity market is also a good leading indicator.  No need to cover this today.

Categories: Global Economy, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: On My Radar, recession, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, Trade Signals, trend following

“The S&P 500: Just Say No”

Posted on 08.21.17 |

James Montier from GMO along with his colleague, Matt Kadnar, put out an excellent piece last week.  They explained how GMO gets to the -4.2% annualized real return forecast for U.S. Large Cap stocks.

With everyone herding into passive index funds, James and Matt begin by addressing what you are probably hearing from your clients.  “U.S. stocks have outperformed for the last number of years, so I see no reason why that should not continue.”

Yes, but not likely.  Here is a look at their forward return estimates for various asset classes.

Click below to read more about GMO’s methodology and forward estimates for the S&P 500.

READ MORE

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing

What does the latest Fed rate increase mean for stocks?

Posted on 06.19.17 |

The Fed raised rates last week and bond yields sank lower.  Many expected the opposite reaction.  If you missed last summer’s mortgage refi opportunity, I believe you are going to get another chance.  Interest rates appear to be heading back down towards their July 2016 lows.

And what are the implications of Fed policy on the U.S. stock market?  Ned Davis Research’s Ed Clissold pointed out in a tweet late yesterday, “Today’s #FOMC decision is a reminder that even slow tightening cycles eventually impact the stock market. #fed @NDR_Research.”

The chart Ed shared in his tweet follows.  Here is how to read it:

  • NDR compares market gains during slow tightening cycles (black line in chart) vs. fast tightening cycles (red line in chart) vs. non tightening cycles (green line in chart), and more.
  • It looks at what happened historically to the stock market in periods when the Fed was quickly raising rates vs. slowly raising rates – like the current cycle.
  • The purple line is the current Fed tightening cycle that began in December 2015.
  • Note how NDR breaks out % Gain During 1st Year and % Gain During 2nd Year. We now find ourselves in year 2.  Purple line (right-hand side of chart).
    • Year 1 gains averaged 10.8%
    • Year 2 gains averaged -1.8%
  • The green line shows non-cycles… markets do better when the Fed is lowering (easing), not raising (tightening), interest rates. “Don’t fight the Fed” as they say.

Categories: Monetary Policy, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Equities, ETF, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, The Fed

Animal Spirits and the “Fear Gauge”

Posted on 05.16.17 |

In Friday’s On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal wrote, “Last Monday, the VIX broke below 10 to close at 9.77, the lowest level in more than a decade.  There are only three other days the index has closed at lower levels, all of them in December 1993.  Investors are complacent to risk.  They shouldn’t be.”

Investment consulting firm 720Global also recently wrote about market volatility in The Unseen, “Volatility: A Misleading Measure of Risk.”

As investors, we are negligent if we follow the Fed’s lead into this complacent stupor. By prodding economic growth with unproductive debt and reigniting asset bubbles, the central banks have simply done more of what created the spasms of 2008 in the first place. Despite the markets calm façade and historically low perception of risk, the vast chasm that lies between perceived risk and reality is troublesome.

READ MORE

Categories: Global Economy, Market Snapshot, Monetary Policy, Portfolio Construction, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Equities, ETF, On My Radar, Risk, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Stocks, Tactical Investing, The Fed, VIX, volatility

Fed Leaves Interest Rates Unchanged; Expresses Confidence in Economy

Posted on 05.04.17 |

Following a two-day meeting of the policy-making Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Federal Reserve held current interest rates steady, but the central bank is likely to raise rates in the coming months (possibly in mid-June).  Fed officials are not worried about the slow pace of growth during the first quarter of 2017.  (U.S. GDP grew at an annualized rate of 0.7 percent.)  The Fed said the slowdown was “likely to be transitory.”

“Inflation measured on a 12-month basis recently has been running close to the committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective,” the Fed said.  Household spending rose “only modestly” but the fundamentals underpinning consumption growth “remained solid.”

Declines in the unemployment rate has been the primary driver behind the Fed’s recent rate increases.  The unemployment rate fell to 4.5 percent in March, the lowest level since 2007.  (The Labor Department will release the April jobs report on Friday.)

Categories: Global Economy, Monetary Policy, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Debt, Interest Rates, Rates, Tactical Investing, The Fed

Charts of the Week

Posted on 03.13.17 |

My favorite trend following indicator is something we co-created with Ned Davis Research.  It looks at the underlying trends in 22 industry sectors and scores the weight of evidence on a 0 to 100 scale.  Here is the chart if you haven’t seen it before (note: I post it every Wednesday afternoon in Trade Signals).  The trend for equities is currently bullish.

What about bond exposure?  We monitor the Zweig Bond Model.

3.10.3

Please refer to the March 10, 2017 post of On My Radar for an explanation of how it works.

Finally, I believe the key to investing and perhaps the most important lesson to learn is how money compounds over time.  To that end, I wrote a piece called the “Merciless Mathematics of Loss.”  Next is the chart and you can find the full piece here.

Categories: Equities, Fixed Income, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Equities, ETFs, fixed income, On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, Trade Signals, Zweig Bond Model

Charts of the Week

Posted on 02.27.17 |

This week we offer several charts concerning inflation, interest rates, U.S. economic recoveries, equity market performance and equity mutual fund flows.

This chart plots U.S. economic recoveries.  Note the blue line.  Debt’s a major drag:

0224-04

Source: Crestmont Research

Keep an eye on inflation (rising):

0224-05

Year-over-year change in CPI – look at the January numbers in the far right of the chart. The most recent BLS – Bureau of Labor Statistics Annualized Inflation Rate year-over-year equals 2.5%.  The Fed’s target has been reached:

0224-06

Source: Advisor Perspectives

And if you were wondering what inflation looks like by category:

0224-07

Source: dshort.com

0224-08

Source: dshort.com

Here is the current probability of a Fed March interest rate hike:

0224-09

Switching to equities, Ned Davis Research has something they call “Top Watch Indicators”… meaning indicators that help them spot a probable market top.

Here’s how you view the next chart:

  • When the green bars in the lower section rise above the horizontal dotted line (50), a market top is indicated.
  • The vertical dotted lines and shaded area indicates the times that more than 50% of their top watch indicators signaled a market top.
  • Percentage declines are indicated.
  • Green bar on the far right shows where we are as of 2-14-17.

0224-10

Source: Ned Davis Research

Chalk one little dot up for the active fund managers.  All the money has been flowing into passive index funds and ETFs:

0224-11

And all that money that chased into “high dividend papers?”  In a few short months, they’ve given up six years of excess returns.  I continue to be cautious on high dividend stocks due to over popularity, low interest rates and the risk of rising rates.

0224-12

Diversification has been under pressure the last few years.  The average university endowment lost 1.90% in 2016.  However, it is best viewed over the long term and designed to achieve a certain return relative to an acceptable amount of risk.  100% allocation to stocks is for a different investor risk profile.  Not wise to compare one asset class to a diversified investment plan.  With that said, in case you were wondering… this is how the 10 richest universities invested their money in 2016:0224-13

Categories: Global Economy Tags: Equities, ETFs, Inflation, Ned Davis Research, On My Radar, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, The Fed, valuations

“Don’t Fight the Tape or the Fed”

Posted on 02.21.17 |

The number one rule many of us were taught is “Don’t Fight the Fed.”  I like to add “trend” into that equation and, as you’ll see in the next chart, the math is compelling.

When the Fed raises rates (don’t fight them) and the trend turns negative, equities underperform.  Focus on the red arrows.  Two different time periods are measured, however, the message is the same.  The big corrections come when both the Fed and trend turn negative.  I wrote some time ago in On My Radar to “watch out for minus 2.”  We currently sit at -1.  I’ll share this chart from time to time – especially if -2 is triggered.

Here is how you read the chart:

  • The top section plots the S&P 500 Index but focus on the middle section.
  • NDR has a Multi-Cap Tape Composite Model to measure the technical health of the broad equity market. That model aggregates the signals of over 100 component indicators and generates a signal based on the percentage of the component indicators that are giving a bullish signal for the S&P 500.  It measures momentum and trend.
  • The Fed component is really an interest rate component, which measures the trend in rates by looking at the yield on the 10-year Treasury note. When the 10-week trend in yields are lower than their 70-week trend in yields, the S&P 500 has produced larger gains.  When it is higher, the S&P 500 has performed poorly.  It’s that simple.
  • The combined indicator can produce a score of -2 (both indicators are bearish) to +2 (both bullish) and overall have done a good job historically as a risk-on/risk-off indicator.
  • The current reading is -1 (data shows we need to watch out for -2): refer to the red arrows.

0217-11

Source: Ned Davis Research

MORE

Categories: Equities, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Equities, ETFs, Federal Reserve, Monetary Policy, On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, The Fed, trend following

Beware: Rising Rate Environment

Posted on 02.21.17 |

Reminder for bond investors: When interest rates rise, bonds lose value.  I shared the following chart in July 2016 (interestingly just two days from the 1.37% low in yields).  It shows how much money is lost for every 1% increase in rates.  The top section is the 10-year Treasury bond and the bottom section is the 30-year Treasury.  (I know I’ve shared this chart with you several times, but I believe it is worth revisiting.  I just don’t believe the average investor knows just how much risk they are taking on with their so called “safe” investments.)

0217-01

1.37% was the low yield back on July 13, 2016. The 10-year Treasury is currently yielding 2.42% and the 30-year is yielding 3.02%.  That adds up to a -8.84% loss in value for the 10-year and call it a -16% for the 30-year.  Maybe rates move back down, but I’m not so sure.  I’m a bit more worried about what those losses will look like when yields rise to 3.4%, 4.4% and 5.4% (similar to where they were in 2007).  -30% is a real risk.

MORE

Categories: Fixed Income, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Bonds, ETF, ETFs, fixed income, On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, Zweig Bond Model

Next Page »

Top Posts

  • Building A Hunker Down ETF Portfolio - Blumenthal at Barron's
  • Blumenthal in WSJ on Valuations And Forward Returns
  • CMG's Total Portfolio Solution Whitepaper Free Download
  • CMG Adopts GIPS Standards Verified By Ashland Partners
  • Charting The New Bull Market in Gold - Blumenthal in Forbes

Categories

  • CMG News
  • Conferences
  • Equities
  • Fixed Income
  • Global Economy
  • Market Snapshot
  • Marketing
  • Monetary Policy
  • Portfolio Construction
  • Practice Management
  • Tactical Investment Strategies
  • top posts

Archives

Browse the blog A-Z

CMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. • 1000 Continental Drive, Suite 570 • King of Prussia, PA 19406 • P:610.989.9090 • E:advisors@cmgwealth.com

©2018 Capital Management Group, Inc, All Rights Reserved

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG Capital Management Group, Inc (or any of its related entities-together "CMG") will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. No portion of the content should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. References to specific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.
Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/or recommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current recommendations or opinions. Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CMG or the professional advisors of your choosing. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.
This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities. Please note: In the event that CMG references performance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive of dividends. The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced funds and/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMG client. CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods.
Hypothetical Presentations: To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including: (1) the model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using client assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight; (2) back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the adviser’s use of the model if the model had been used during the period to actually mange client assets; and, (3) CMG’s clients may have experienced investment results during the corresponding time periods that were materially different from those portrayed in the model. Please Also Note: Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index. (i.e. S&P 500 Total Return or Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. 5000 Total Market Index) is also disclosed. For example, the S&P 500 Composite Total Return Index (the “S&P”) is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. Standard & Poor’s chooses the member companies for the S&P based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The historical performance results of the S&P (and those of or all indices) and the model results do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges, nor the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing indicated historical performance results. For example, the deduction combined annual advisory and transaction fees of 1.00% over a 10 year period would decrease a 10% gross return to an 8.9% net return. The S&P is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet, his/her investment objective(s). A corresponding description of the other comparative indices, are available from CMG upon request. It should not be assumed that any CMG holdings will correspond directly to any such comparative index. The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes. CMG portfolios may be more or less volatile than the reflective indices and/or models.
In the event that there has been a change in an individual's investment objective or financial situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with his/her investment professionals.
Written Disclosure Statement. CMG is an SEC registered investment adviser principally located in King of Prussia, PA. Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG's founder and CEO. Please note: The above views are those of CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage to manage any CMG strategy. A copy of CMG's current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available upon request or via CMG's internet web site at (http://www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures/advs).