CMG AdvisorCentral

Tactical investing news, views and resources for financial advisors

TwitterGoogle+Linkedin
  • Blog
    • Contributors
  • Advisor Resources
  • About CMG
    • Sitemap
  • Events

Archives for September 2016

Audio Links to Morningstar ETF Conference Panels

Posted on 09.26.16 |

We were fortunate enough to obtain the audio recordings of the “Beyond the 60/40 Portfolio” and “Best Ideas” panels from the 2016 Morningstar ETF Conference.  Please click on the images below for the recordings.

mstar-image-copy

us_etf2016_935x300-gif

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: ETF, On My Radar, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal

Best Ideas (Part II) from the Morningstar ETF Conference

Posted on 09.26.16 |

ms-etf-conferenceOn September 8, Steve Blumenthal appeared on a panel regarding portfolio construction (“Beyond the 60/40 Portfolio”) at the Morningstar ETF Conference in Chicago.

One of Steve’s favorite sessions was the “Best Ideas” panel, which featured Mark Yusko of Morgan Creek Capital Management, John West of Research Affiliates, and Rich Bernstein of RBA.  Steve shared Part I of his notes from the Best Ideas panel in the September 16, 2016 edition of On My Radar.

Steve shared Part II of his notes in Friday’s On My Radar.  Read on!

READ MORE

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: ETF, ETF Strategists, On My Radar, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing

Global Debt Jubilee?

Posted on 09.20.16 |

When you borrow from tomorrow to spend today, that leveraged spending is good for growth.  At some point, you reach an end to just how much debt you can take on.  Reinhart and Rogoff suggest that threshold, based on hundreds of years of study, is 90% debt-to-GDP.  At some point, you cross a line. Take a look at the chart below.

9-16-9

I believe we are in a low growth, deflationary-pressured world until we solve and reorganize the debt mess.  A global debt jubilee?  We have a serious problem to solve and there is little motivation at this point to get started.  The markets may just force that hand.

READ MORE

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Debt, ETF Strategists, global debt, Hedging, Risk, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing

Best Ideas from the Morningstar ETF Conference

Posted on 09.20.16 |

ms-etf-conferenceOn September 8, I had the privilege of participating on a panel regarding portfolio construction (“Beyond the 60/40 Portfolio”) at the Morningstar ETF Conference in Chicago.  Not surprisingly, there were a lot of terrific discussions, and I took tons of detailed notes.  One of my favorite sessions was the “Best Ideas” panel, which featured Mark Yusko of Morgan Creek Capital Management, John West of Research Affiliates, and Rich Bernstein of RBA.  Morningstar’s Jeff Ptak did a great job moderating the panel.

As promised, I shared some of my notes from the Best Ideas panel in Friday’s On My Radar.  More to come from the conference later this week.  Stay tuned!

READ MORE

Categories: Conferences, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: ETF, ETF Strategists, ETFs, On My Radar, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal

Elliott Management’s Paul Singer Warns of “Dangerous Time” in Global Financial Markets

Posted on 09.13.16 |

In the August 19, 2016, issue of On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal cited a CNBC article discussing Elliott Management’s quarterly investor letter by Paul Singer, which predicted a forthcoming market “breakdown.”  Singer contends that the global bond market is “broken.”

Today, at CNBC’s Delivering Alpha conference, Singer criticized central bankers and specifically the Federal Reserve saying, “What they have done is created a tremendous increase in hidden risk, risk that investors don’t exactly know or have faced about their holdings.  I think it’s a very dangerous time in the global economy and global financial markets.”

In these volatile, unpredictable times, advisors need to know that someone has their back.  We’ve got your back.  CMG is here to serve our clients, exceed their expectations and help build the strongest all-weather portfolios possible.  Contact us today.

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: advisor, advisors, Equities, fixed income, On My Radar, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, The Fed

Mauldin’s “Monetary Mountain Madness”

Posted on 09.12.16 |

If you read just one piece this week, read John Mauldin’s “Monetary Mountain Madness.”

John’s promise: “I trust that by the end of this letter you will better understand just how bankrupt – and disastrous – what passes for sound economic thinking among the world’s central bankers actually is.”

Terrific article!

Categories: Monetary Policy Tags: fixed income, high yield, The Fed, Zweig Bond Model

Trade Signals – Sentiment Better, Risk On Remains

Posted on 09.07.16 |

With a nod towards broad portfolio diversification, following is a quick summary of what I am seeing this week — organized by investment category (equity markets, fixed income and liquid alternatives):

Equity Markets: Investor Sentiment moved from excessive optimism to neutral.  The trend remains positive.  Supply and demand continues to evidence more buyers than sellers (a bullish signal).  Don’t Fight the Tape or the Fed moved from 0 to -1.  This next chart shows us why we want to watch out for -2 (an unfavorable trend and unfriendly Fed environment):

09.07.01

The 13/34-Week EMA trend indicator remains bullish.  The CMG NDR Large Cap Momentum Index is nearing a buy signal; its model trend line is bullish.

A quick note on the chart above:  NDR shows price appreciation and not total return.  So, the Buy/Hold + 8.55% Gain/Annum would be higher with dividends added in.  That would be more informative; however, since we are comparing the price appreciation in each zone (+2, +1, Neutral (0) as reflected), I believe the data is telling and useful in giving us a sense for which environments suggest more or less risk.  Actual returns in each category are higher.  A thank you to an astute reader.

Fixed Income: The 10-year Treasury Yield is back down to 1.52%.  Money is voting with its pocket… saying the Fed won’t raise rates.  The Zweig Bond Model remains bullish on bonds and our HY remains in a buy signal.  The underlying HY fundamentals are terrible; however, this is another good example where trend following can be a good friend.  We will ride the uptrend until it reverses.  Further, we see “JNK” and “PCY” exhibiting the strongest relative strength in fixed income (this from a universe of nine ETFs ranging from short-term and long-term Treasury bonds, corporate bonds, munis, high yield, emerging market, inflation and developed market bonds).

Liquid Alternatives: The CMG Opportunistic All Asset ETF Strategy is currently allocated approximately 81% to equities and 19% to fixed income.  We are seeing strong relative price leadership in “EEM” (Emerging Markets), “VT” (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF), “QQQ” and “IYW” (Technology ETFs) and “IYF” (U.S. Financials).  Our two fixed income ETFs, “EDV” (Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury) and “TLT” (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond), have rallied nicely.  Biotech looks to be recovering from the Hillary Clinton statements.  For weightings by asset class, please see the CMG Opportunistic All Asset Strategy pie chart below.  Gold (“GLD”) looks to have held support at 125.  The cyclical trend for gold remains higher as evidenced by the Gold chart you’ll find in the full post (link below).

For charts, analysis, and commentary see the rest of the story in Trade Signals — Sentiment Better, Risk On Remains.

The current opinions and forecasts expressed herein are solely those of Steve Blumenthal and are subject to change.  They do not represent the opinions of CMG.  CMG’s trading strategies are quantitative and may hold a position that at any given time does not reflect Steve’s forecasts.  Steve’s opinions and forecasts may not actually come to pass.  Information on this site should not be used as a recommendation to buy or sell any investment product or strategy.

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: CMG NDR Large Cap Momentum Index, CMG opportunistic All Asset Strategy, Equities, ETF, fixed income, Gold, high yield, Tactical Investing, Trade Signals, Zweig Bond Model

Current High Valuations Suggest Low 10-Year Returns for Stocks

Posted on 09.06.16 |

Both professional and individual investors must recognize the relationship between risk and reward (i.e., returns).  Indeed, as fiduciaries, investment advisers are duty-bound to protect their clients’ interests and elevate them above their own.  We’ve been writing for some time that current market valuations are very high and, when the market is at these excessive levels, returns are typically reduced.

On August 31, the S&P 500 median price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 23.7.  (Think of “median P/E” (which is based on actual, reported earnings and current share price) as the middle P/E (250 stocks have a lower P/E and 250 have a higher P/E).)

9.2.2

I’ve shared the chart above previously.  It shows that returns are highest when the market is most favorably priced (low median P/Es) and lowest when the market is least favorable priced (high median P/Es).  We are in Quintile 5 today.  The next chart shows that not only were returns lowest when P/Es are high, like they are today, the risk is actually the highest.

9.2.3

In fact, some investment managers, are further lowering forward return expectations for equities.  GMO recently revised its real return forecast for large-cap equities to -3.2% from -1.9.

9.2.8

For charts, analysis, and commentary, see the rest of the story in On My Radar: Why? Because We Need the Eggs

The current opinions and forecasts expressed herein are solely those of Steve Blumenthal and are subject to change.  They do not represent the opinions of CMG.  CMGs trading strategies are quantitative and may hold a position that at any given time does not reflect Steve’s forecasts.  Steve’s opinions and forecasts may not actually come to pass. Information on this site should not be used as a recommendation to buy or sell any investment product or strategy.

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Equities, On My Radar, PE, Steve Blumenthal, Stocks, Tactical Investing, valuations

Why I Don’t Follow Consensus Earnings Estimates

Posted on 09.06.16 |

I bet that you, like me, get a number of client calls that reference a Wall Street report touting forward P/Es.  The client watched an analyst on TV saying P/Es are cheap based on next year’s earnings estimates.  The analyst compared that forward estimate based P/E, which is 17.20 as of August 31, 2016, to 23.7 (median P/E) or 26 (Shiller P/E) and says the market is not so richly priced.

Not only is that poor analysis, if you look at forward P/E and compare it to other periods in time, you’ll see that the current level is as high as it was in 2007 and higher than any other period since the 1960s with the exception of the late 1990s and early 2000s.

With that said, here is the main reason I don’t rely on Wall Street “consensus” earnings estimates.  The next chart shows year by year where Wall Street’s estimates began and where they finished up.  For example, look at the 2016 estimates (orange line).  Back in March 2015, the consensus earnings estimate for 2016 was approximately $137.50 in operating earnings per share for the S&P 500.  The most recent estimate, as of August 24, 2016, is $110.84 per share.

9.2.9

Take a look at each year.  Note how it started high and how much it declined by the time the actual numbers were reported.  Keep in mind we won’t know 2016 numbers until Q1 2017.  And we won’t have 2017 numbers until Q1 2018.  My simple point is… how can we rely on forward P/E based on Wall Street’s earnings estimates?  I can’t.

Click here to find out what actually happened with consensus estimates.

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Equities, On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal, Stocks

Top Posts

  • Building A Hunker Down ETF Portfolio - Blumenthal at Barron's
  • Blumenthal in WSJ on Valuations And Forward Returns
  • CMG's Total Portfolio Solution Whitepaper Free Download
  • CMG Adopts GIPS Standards Verified By Ashland Partners
  • Charting The New Bull Market in Gold - Blumenthal in Forbes

Categories

  • CMG News
  • Conferences
  • Equities
  • Fixed Income
  • Global Economy
  • Market Snapshot
  • Marketing
  • Monetary Policy
  • Portfolio Construction
  • Practice Management
  • Tactical Investment Strategies
  • top posts

Archives

Browse the blog A-Z

CMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. • 1000 Continental Drive, Suite 570 • King of Prussia, PA 19406 • P:610.989.9090 • E:advisors@cmgwealth.com

©2018 Capital Management Group, Inc, All Rights Reserved

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG Capital Management Group, Inc (or any of its related entities-together "CMG") will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. No portion of the content should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. References to specific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.
Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/or recommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current recommendations or opinions. Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CMG or the professional advisors of your choosing. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.
This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities. Please note: In the event that CMG references performance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive of dividends. The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced funds and/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMG client. CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods.
Hypothetical Presentations: To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including: (1) the model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using client assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight; (2) back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the adviser’s use of the model if the model had been used during the period to actually mange client assets; and, (3) CMG’s clients may have experienced investment results during the corresponding time periods that were materially different from those portrayed in the model. Please Also Note: Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index. (i.e. S&P 500 Total Return or Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. 5000 Total Market Index) is also disclosed. For example, the S&P 500 Composite Total Return Index (the “S&P”) is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. Standard & Poor’s chooses the member companies for the S&P based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The historical performance results of the S&P (and those of or all indices) and the model results do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges, nor the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing indicated historical performance results. For example, the deduction combined annual advisory and transaction fees of 1.00% over a 10 year period would decrease a 10% gross return to an 8.9% net return. The S&P is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet, his/her investment objective(s). A corresponding description of the other comparative indices, are available from CMG upon request. It should not be assumed that any CMG holdings will correspond directly to any such comparative index. The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes. CMG portfolios may be more or less volatile than the reflective indices and/or models.
In the event that there has been a change in an individual's investment objective or financial situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with his/her investment professionals.
Written Disclosure Statement. CMG is an SEC registered investment adviser principally located in King of Prussia, PA. Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG's founder and CEO. Please note: The above views are those of CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage to manage any CMG strategy. A copy of CMG's current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available upon request or via CMG's internet web site at (http://www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures/advs).