CMG AdvisorCentral

Tactical investing news, views and resources for financial advisors

TwitterGoogle+Linkedin
  • Blog
    • Contributors
  • Advisor Resources
  • About CMG
    • Sitemap
  • Events
You are here: Home / Global Economy / The Ukrainian Butterfly Effect

The Ukrainian Butterfly Effect

Posted on 03.20.14 |

PJ Grzywacz President, Chief Compliance Officer, CMG Capital Management Group

PJ Grzywacz
President & Chief Compliance Officer
CMG

Before the recent events in the Black Sea, few investors, financiers or market commentators would have been able to place Crimea on a map, much less appreciate its impact on the global financial markets, investment portfolios and stock market risk.  The events of the past several weeks in the Ukraine and Crimea have captured everyone’s attention as hot headed media analysts talk of a new Cold War and Putin’s annexation of Crimea.  The truth is much more complicated than that and the impact of these events is much more subtle than the headline grabbing sanctions against Russian oligarchs seeking to fill their shopping bags in New York or London.

The Ukraine has been at a crossroads of east and west, Europe and Asia for hundreds of years and ethnic boundaries are rarely as easily drawn as the maps we use to find these distant lands.  Elections over the past several years have worn out these historic fault lines – the east pulling towards Russia and the west aspiring to join the EU.  Historically, the Russians, the Poles, the Austro-Hungarians and the Ottomans (to name a few) have battled and controlled these lands at various points in history pulling the country, its borders, its culture and religion in different directions.  During the second world war (or the Great Patriotic War as the Russians and eastern Ukrainian’s refer to it), these tensions were strained further as fascist resistance to communist forces moving west made a hero out of Ukrainian Insurgent Army leader, Stepan Bandera (to western Ukrainian’s) (in 2006 a statue was erected in the central square of Lviv.)  While not the majority of protesters, members of the extreme nationalist right wing who were involved in driving President Yanukovych out, draw much inspiration from Bandara’s fascism and rumors are rampant about the extent to which right wing protesters were involved in scuttling the compromise, which ultimately lead to the departure of Yanukovych and then subsequent Russian action in Crimea.

For eastern Ukrainians, where Russian influence has been stronger, particularly after the second world war, the actions of the far right bring back memories of the battle against fascism that scorched the Ukrainian homeland.  To disregard their anxieties is to simplify the dynamics of this land to an us vs. them and Putin vs. the west level.  The situation is much more complicated than that.  The Crimean peninsula is 60% ethnic Russian, followed by approximately a quarter Ukrainian and more than 10% Crimean Tatar.  While the majority of the people are ethnic Russians (not quite the 97% that voted to join Russia), the Ukrainians and Tatars (a predominately Muslim group) have complex histories with Russian persecution and deportation.  In 1954, Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine in a moment of historic symbolism that many Russians have yet to Putin and Obamacome to terms with.  The dynamics of the military and economic relationship between Russia and Ukraine reflects this turbulent past.  In 1994, the Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons (the third largest stockpile in the world at the time) in exchange for a promise from Russia (and the US) to not use force or threaten military action against it.  Energy policy further complicates the Ukraine’s position in this crisis as natural gas pipelines that power western Europe, namely Germany, run through Ukraine.  Russia has not hesitated to use this lever in the past and is one of the primary concerns for the US and Europe as they negotiate with Putin.

What does this mean for your portfolio?  It feels like we have been asking that question with greater frequency in recent years in response to crises in countries and regions that play small, if not miniscule roles, in global finance.  Whether it is Greece, Cyprus or South Ossetia in 2008 (the last time Russia annexed a former territory), small changes in financially insignificant locations can have an unhealthy impact on your portfolio.  It is a symptom of our globalized world that financial systems have become even more interconnected, creating a complex financial system, where risk is not easily defined and relatively small initial events can create large impacts in far off places – a financial butterfly effect. In the past two weeks, Russian markets have crashed and rallied (the Market Vectors Russia ETF Ticker:  RSX has dropped by a third since last November when the crisis started and is experiencing three times its normal volume), foreign central bank holdings at the Fed have plunged by $106 million in a week (the biggest one week drop on record and presumed to be Russia shifting its holdings to protect the ruble) and the propaganda continues to run rampant from east and west.  The actions of past weeks could be the impetus to jump start a transatlantic trade deal as the US has plenty of shale gas to offer, on better terms than Russia.  The current geopolitical skirmish could quickly turn into an economic tit for tat – history is littered with trade wars that lead to real wars and the unraveling of monetary systems (for a great summary see the excellent book by Jim Rickards, Currency Wars).

As portfolio managers, we may not be able to predict every event, but we can build better portfolios than ever before – the tools are there that allow investors to manage risk.  We can incorporate diverse assets classes and different strategies (tactical vs. buy and hold) with the goal of building a better portfolio that can withstand greater and more unpredictable shocks.  There is no crystal ball, but during a year where we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Great War, it bears noting that small events in places like Sarajevo can lead to unexpected and significant outcomes.  It is too early to tell where the dust will settle in Ukraine, but to quote Art Cashin, “stay wary, alert and very nimble”.  – PJ Grzywacz

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Categories: Global Economy, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Global Economy, PJ Grzywacz, Russia, Tactical Investing, Ukraine

Top Posts

  • Building A Hunker Down ETF Portfolio - Blumenthal at Barron's
  • Blumenthal in WSJ on Valuations And Forward Returns
  • CMG's Total Portfolio Solution Whitepaper Free Download
  • CMG Adopts GIPS Standards Verified By Ashland Partners
  • Charting The New Bull Market in Gold - Blumenthal in Forbes

Categories

  • CMG News
  • Conferences
  • Equities
  • Fixed Income
  • Global Economy
  • Market Snapshot
  • Marketing
  • Monetary Policy
  • Portfolio Construction
  • Practice Management
  • Tactical Investment Strategies
  • top posts

Archives

Browse the blog A-Z

CMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. • 1000 Continental Drive, Suite 570 • King of Prussia, PA 19406 • P:610.989.9090 • E:advisors@cmgwealth.com

©2018 Capital Management Group, Inc, All Rights Reserved

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG Capital Management Group, Inc (or any of its related entities-together "CMG") will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. No portion of the content should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. References to specific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.
Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/or recommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current recommendations or opinions. Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CMG or the professional advisors of your choosing. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.
This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities. Please note: In the event that CMG references performance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive of dividends. The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced funds and/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMG client. CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods.
Hypothetical Presentations: To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including: (1) the model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using client assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight; (2) back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the adviser’s use of the model if the model had been used during the period to actually mange client assets; and, (3) CMG’s clients may have experienced investment results during the corresponding time periods that were materially different from those portrayed in the model. Please Also Note: Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index. (i.e. S&P 500 Total Return or Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. 5000 Total Market Index) is also disclosed. For example, the S&P 500 Composite Total Return Index (the “S&P”) is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. Standard & Poor’s chooses the member companies for the S&P based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The historical performance results of the S&P (and those of or all indices) and the model results do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges, nor the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing indicated historical performance results. For example, the deduction combined annual advisory and transaction fees of 1.00% over a 10 year period would decrease a 10% gross return to an 8.9% net return. The S&P is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet, his/her investment objective(s). A corresponding description of the other comparative indices, are available from CMG upon request. It should not be assumed that any CMG holdings will correspond directly to any such comparative index. The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes. CMG portfolios may be more or less volatile than the reflective indices and/or models.
In the event that there has been a change in an individual's investment objective or financial situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with his/her investment professionals.
Written Disclosure Statement. CMG is an SEC registered investment adviser principally located in King of Prussia, PA. Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG's founder and CEO. Please note: The above views are those of CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage to manage any CMG strategy. A copy of CMG's current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available upon request or via CMG's internet web site at (http://www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures/advs).