CMG AdvisorCentral

Tactical investing news, views and resources for financial advisors

TwitterGoogle+Linkedin
  • Blog
    • Contributors
  • Advisor Resources
  • About CMG
    • Sitemap
  • Events

Bob Rubin Interviews David Swensen

Posted on 11.20.17 |

In Friday’s On My Radar, Steve links to a great interview of David Swensen, Yale’s CIO, by former Goldman co-chairman and former Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin.

Take a few minutes and watch the interview.  It’s worth it.  Add Swensen to the list of famed investors predicting low single-digit forward returns.  He shares some sage advice on portfolio management and diversification.

Click the photo for the full interview.

Categories: Portfolio Construction Tags: Diversification, Practice Management, Risk, Risk management, Tactical Investing

Animal Spirits and the “Fear Gauge”

Posted on 05.16.17 |

In Friday’s On My Radar, Steve Blumenthal wrote, “Last Monday, the VIX broke below 10 to close at 9.77, the lowest level in more than a decade.  There are only three other days the index has closed at lower levels, all of them in December 1993.  Investors are complacent to risk.  They shouldn’t be.”

Investment consulting firm 720Global also recently wrote about market volatility in The Unseen, “Volatility: A Misleading Measure of Risk.”

As investors, we are negligent if we follow the Fed’s lead into this complacent stupor. By prodding economic growth with unproductive debt and reigniting asset bubbles, the central banks have simply done more of what created the spasms of 2008 in the first place. Despite the markets calm façade and historically low perception of risk, the vast chasm that lies between perceived risk and reality is troublesome.

READ MORE

Categories: Global Economy, Market Snapshot, Monetary Policy, Portfolio Construction, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Equities, ETF, On My Radar, Risk, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Stocks, Tactical Investing, The Fed, VIX, volatility

Charts of the Week

Posted on 03.21.17 |

I personally believe that recessions can be forecast in advance.  While no indicator is perfect, there are a few processes that have had a high correct signal rate in the past.

The reason that getting in front of recession is important is that it is during recessions that all the bad corrections tend to happen.  Bad as in -40% bad.

The other problem with recessions is that they are only known in hindsight.  It takes two quarters of negative GDP growth for the chief recession czars at the National Bureau of Economic Research to tell us when the recession actually started.

Following are three of my favorite leading “recession watch” indicator charts:

Chart 1: The Economy (no current sign of recession)

Here is how you read this chart:

  • Believe it or not, the stock market is a great leading indicator for the economy. It tends to turn down in advance of recession.
  • This process (bottom section of the chart) plots the S&P 500 Index (red line) and also a five-month smoothed moving average of the S&P 500.
  • The smoothed dotted line (green in lower section) represents the trend of the market’s prices.
  • When the red line (S&P 500 Index) drops below its smoothed moving average trend line (dotted green line) by 4.8% or more, a recession signal is generated.
  • When the red line rises above the dotted green line by 3.6% or more, a bullish signal is triggered for the economy.
  • The down arrows are the recession signals, up arrows are the expansion signals.
  • The gray vertical shaded lines mark the beginning and end of all the recessions since 1948.
  • In total, 79% of the signals have been correct though some have been a little early or just a little late. There were a few false signals but they didn’t keep you offsides for long.  All in all, in my opinion, pretty darn good.

0317.00

Chart 2: The Economy vs. the Employment Trends Index

Here is how you read the chart:

  • 100% correct signals
  • Down arrow – recession signal is generated when the Employment Trends Index drops by 4.8% from the most recent high watermark.
  • Up arrow – expansion signal is generated when the Employment Trends Index rises from its most recent low watermark by just 0.4%.
  • Data 1979 through 2/28/2017

0317.01

Chart 3: Global Recession Probability Model

Here is how you read the chart:

  • High global recession probability when the blue line is above the dotted red line.
  • Low global recession probability when the blue line is below the dotted green line (like today).
  • The box at the bottom right shows what happened. When above the dotted red line (the 70 level on the chart), recession occurred 81.46% of the time.  54% of the time (including the most recent high recession risk reading in 2016), a recession did not occur.  This is a probability game, folks… but pretty good accurate history.

0317.06

Conclusion: Low current risk of a U.S. recession.  Low current risk of a global recession.

Categories: Global Economy, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Ned Davis Research, On My Radar, recession, Risk, Steve Blumenthal, Trade Signals

College Endowment Returns Were Negative in 2016 and Negative Since 2007

Posted on 02.06.17 |

U.S. stocks have worked well since the 2008/09 financial crisis.  Modern Portfolio Theory – broad asset class diversification has not.  But I didn’t know it was this challenging.  I was somewhat surprised to see this from Bloomberg:

Endowments were hampered by investments in non-U.S. equities, which declined 7.8 percent, energy and natural resources, which lost 7.5 percent, and commodities and managed futures, which were down 7.7 percent.

Wealthier schools’ performance was dragged down by their larger allocations to riskier alternatives such as hedge funds. Hedge funds were among the worst performers for endowments of all sizes, with a 4.0 percent loss.

Endowments with more than $1 billion declined 1.9 percent, the same as the average.  The blue line tracks the performance.  Reflected are negative returns for 2016 and negative overall returns from 2007 – 2016:

0203-12

More from Bloomberg: Endowments were hampered by investments in non-U.S. equities, which declined 7.8 percent, energy and natural resources, which lost 7.5 percent, and commodities and managed futures, which were down 7.7 percent.

It causes one to think – who needs diversification anymore?  We likely need it most when the risk feels the least (like today) and need it least when the risk feels the most (like early 2000 and 2008/09).

Things just don’t smell right to me.  It feels like it is 1999 all over again.  This time we are witnessing a massive shift into low-fee passive (non-managed) index products.  Active money managers are taking it on the chin.

However, like all that money that raced to technology funds at the market peak in the late 1990’s.  The -75% tech wreck followed.  That same bad behavioral trend is alive and well today.  Stay risk minded.  It took 15 years and a 300% recovery gain to overcome that loss and get back to even.  Just saying…

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Bloomberg, On My Radar, Risk, Tactical Investing

Inflation Risk is High

Posted on 01.17.17 |

Monitoring inflation is critical since turning points in inflation often determine turning points in the financial markets.

  • The Ned Davis Research Inflation Timing Model consists of 22 indicators that primarily measure the various rates of change of such indicators as commodity prices, consumer prices, producer prices, and industrial production. The model totals all the indicator readings and provides a score ranging from +22 (strong inflationary pressures) to -22 (strong disinflationary pressures).
  • That data is plotted in red in the lower section of the chart.
  • High Inflationary Pressures are signaled when the model rises to +6 or above.  Low Inflationary Pressures are indicated when the model falls to zero or less.
  • Current reading is “High Inflationary Pressures.”
  • Signals in the upper section – up and down arrows.
  • Correct signals 73% of the time. Pretty good historical record.

0113-07

Source: Ned Davis Research (includes disclosure)

Rising inflation is bad for bond investors and generally bad for stocks but is bonds I worry about most today.

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Bonds, Inflation, Risk, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal

2017 Predictions

Posted on 01.17.17 |

I hate making predictions.

I got the tech wreck and sub-prime right, but was far too early on those predictions.  Importantly, the predictions below could most certainly be wrong.  We live in a highly complex world.  We can measure instability, we can score up risk but we can’t precisely know timing.The clear risk to me today is in the bond market.

  • U.S. stocks will remain in an uptrend fueled by a strong dollar.
  • Tax cuts, infrastructure spending and $2 trillion in tax repatriation will drive capital flows to the U.S.
  • The European sovereign debt crisis will be the first major crack to crack. Unmanageable debt in Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain.  Include France and Germany in their dysfunctional union.  Confidence in government/political leadership is lost.
  • The European banks sit on the fault line. Watch the banks.  Hope so… Not so sure.
  • The smart money races out of EU banks to U.S. dollars and U.S. assets.
  • In China, debt too is the major concern. Ghost cities lacking rental income will prove unable to support the structured debt that financed the construction.  Defaults mount.
  • Drastic measures are put in place to prevent the flow out capital to the U.S.
  • Gates, tariffs, currency wars escalate – trade wars escalate.
  • Loss of confidence in government here, there and most everywhere.
  • Global and U.S. inflation become a major concern as global growth remains well below the average of the last six post-recession expansions.  Click here for a great chart.
  • Stagflation returns. Low growth/high inflation.  Interest rates move higher with the 10-year touching 3% this year and 6% within a few short years.
  • The great bond bull market is over. Bond investors lose money.
READ MORE

Categories: Global Economy, Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Bonds, Equities, fixed income, Gold, recession, Risk, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing, The Fed

Sprechen sie risk?

Posted on 10.03.16 |

2000px-ghs-pictogram-exclam-svgNaturally, because there’s a presidential election this year, every news cycle is very noisy.  It’s critical, however, that we maintain our focus on monitoring and assessing important financial news and managing potential risk.  Such is the case regarding the financial condition of Deutsche Bank (DB).  DB is one of the largest financial institutions on the planet.  And, right now, it may be one of today’s great systemic risks.  Think Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers…

Due to super-sized leverage (like gigantic beer steins at Oktoberfest) and significant counterparty risk, a stumble at DB will ripple through the world’s financial system and would cause great harm.  Read more in this week’s On My Radar.

READ MORE

Categories: Global Economy Tags: Counterparty Risk, Leverage, On My Radar, Risk, Risk management, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Trading

Global Debt Jubilee?

Posted on 09.20.16 |

When you borrow from tomorrow to spend today, that leveraged spending is good for growth.  At some point, you reach an end to just how much debt you can take on.  Reinhart and Rogoff suggest that threshold, based on hundreds of years of study, is 90% debt-to-GDP.  At some point, you cross a line. Take a look at the chart below.

9-16-9

I believe we are in a low growth, deflationary-pressured world until we solve and reorganize the debt mess.  A global debt jubilee?  We have a serious problem to solve and there is little motivation at this point to get started.  The markets may just force that hand.

READ MORE

Categories: Tactical Investment Strategies Tags: Debt, ETF Strategists, global debt, Hedging, Risk, Stephen Blumenthal, Steve Blumenthal, Tactical Investing

What is the Greatest Risk of All?

Posted on 08.21.14 |

Michael F. Sciortino, Sr. Executive Vice President, Managing Director, Head of Distribution, CMG Capital Management Group

Michael F. Sciortino, Sr. Executive Vice President, Managing Director, Head of Distribution, CMG

“I never worry about action, but only about inaction.” – Winston Churchill

Yes, inaction is the greatest risk of all. What might this be costing your clients financially and emotionally to postpone action on implementing a plan for their long term financial security? Early on in my career I had a sales manager who used to say, “There’s never a wrong time to do the right thing. Believing anything else is a risk.” Moving forward toward the achievement of goals requires change, perceived by some as risk. Sure change can be disruptive. You have to change anyway.

This desire to change requires a disciplined commitment and determination to follow through while resisting the temptation to return to old outdated and ineffective strategies. As advisors, we have to ask ourselves, will my client be better off 10 years from now taking action or not taking action? Many fortunes have been amassed over the long term by taking smart calculated risks.

Read More >

Categories: Practice Management Tags: Action, Mike Sciortino, Risk

How to Measure Risk in Investments

Posted on 05.30.14 |

Michael Hee Managing Director, Investment Research CMG

Michael Hee
Managing Director, Investment Research
CMG

In my previous post we discussed “What is Risk.”  As a follow-up, we will begin to explore how to measure risk.  When considering investment options, analyzing performance statistics without consideration of risk does not provide a view of the complete picture.

One of the most common measurements of risk is standard deviation, which statistically measures how observations are dispersed around a central tendency.  From an investment perspective, standard deviation measures how performance may be dispersed about an expected return.

For example, from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2013, the annualized return of the S&P 500 TR Index was +6.13%.  As a comparison, the return of the Barclays Aggregate Bond TR Index (Agg Bond) was +4.91%.   However, the standard deviation of the S&P 500 Index was 16.91% compared to 3.44% for the Agg Bond.  From an average return perspective, not much difference, however the potential dispersion is significant.

Read More >

Categories: Portfolio Construction Tags: Michael Hee, Risk, Standard Deviation

Next Page »

Top Posts

  • Building A Hunker Down ETF Portfolio - Blumenthal at Barron's
  • Blumenthal in WSJ on Valuations And Forward Returns
  • CMG's Total Portfolio Solution Whitepaper Free Download
  • CMG Adopts GIPS Standards Verified By Ashland Partners
  • Charting The New Bull Market in Gold - Blumenthal in Forbes

Categories

  • CMG News
  • Conferences
  • Equities
  • Fixed Income
  • Global Economy
  • Market Snapshot
  • Marketing
  • Monetary Policy
  • Portfolio Construction
  • Practice Management
  • Tactical Investment Strategies
  • top posts

Archives

Browse the blog A-Z

CMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. • 1000 Continental Drive, Suite 570 • King of Prussia, PA 19406 • P:610.989.9090 • E:advisors@cmgwealth.com

©2018 Capital Management Group, Inc, All Rights Reserved

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG Capital Management Group, Inc (or any of its related entities-together "CMG") will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. No portion of the content should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. References to specific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.
Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/or recommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current recommendations or opinions. Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CMG or the professional advisors of your choosing. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.
This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities. Please note: In the event that CMG references performance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive of dividends. The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced funds and/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMG client. CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods.
Hypothetical Presentations: To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including: (1) the model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using client assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight; (2) back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the adviser’s use of the model if the model had been used during the period to actually mange client assets; and, (3) CMG’s clients may have experienced investment results during the corresponding time periods that were materially different from those portrayed in the model. Please Also Note: Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index. (i.e. S&P 500 Total Return or Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. 5000 Total Market Index) is also disclosed. For example, the S&P 500 Composite Total Return Index (the “S&P”) is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. Standard & Poor’s chooses the member companies for the S&P based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The historical performance results of the S&P (and those of or all indices) and the model results do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges, nor the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing indicated historical performance results. For example, the deduction combined annual advisory and transaction fees of 1.00% over a 10 year period would decrease a 10% gross return to an 8.9% net return. The S&P is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet, his/her investment objective(s). A corresponding description of the other comparative indices, are available from CMG upon request. It should not be assumed that any CMG holdings will correspond directly to any such comparative index. The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes. CMG portfolios may be more or less volatile than the reflective indices and/or models.
In the event that there has been a change in an individual's investment objective or financial situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with his/her investment professionals.
Written Disclosure Statement. CMG is an SEC registered investment adviser principally located in King of Prussia, PA. Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG's founder and CEO. Please note: The above views are those of CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage to manage any CMG strategy. A copy of CMG's current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available upon request or via CMG's internet web site at (http://www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures/advs).